Material Matters - The stuff heroes are made of

Over the course of the last two weeks, it happened two times to me that I dropped miniatures while carrying them somewhere. Once at the Legendarium tournament and once at home. At the tournament it was a Davale Numenor warrior and at home it was a Slayer of Men Dol Guldur Nazgul. Both times pieces broke off and I had to glue them together again. 
This made me recall a topic I turned over in my head already for some time - which miniature materials do we encounter in our hobby and what are the advantages and disadvantages?
Allow me to take you on a small tour through the history of miniature materials in MESBG, what we currently have, what the supposedly pros and cons are and my personal experience and preferences =)

Btw: Thanks in advance to all people who fueled me with background information and other input while writing this post!

I will work my way through the materials and keep the following order of  topics for each: Past, Present, Pros & Cons, my opinion.

Metal aka Tin

Past

One of the oldest material for miniatures, not only in MESBG but in the history of tabletop and its predecessors. People from my generation or older probably remember their very first contact with them in the form of small tin soldiers, mostly depicting soldiers from the 17th to early 19th century (Napoleonic Wars etc). 
Their material was not pure tin but also contained a part of lead. This stayed till the 1980s and early 90s but already there , it got gradually reduced. So if you have old Warhammer Fantasy or 40k metal miniatures, chances are good that they still contain lead. I do not know if the lead part was big enough to cause health problems but I think we can agree that it is good we no longer have to deal with it ;) Due to the lead, these miniatures are also darker in appearance.

Present

Metal miniatures from GW nowadays are rather bright in their pure form since they are made of so called "white tin" - the missing lead is the reason. For a long time it was common that new or special miniatures on release were made of tin (not always and not for all factions). This was not only limited to heroes, monsters etc but also could be the case for normal warriors.  A lot of times these miniatures (mostly when being very popular and with high sales figures) received a re-release in a different material and sometimes even with a different design. 

For example the Fellowship of the Ring, the Witch-King, the Balrog, Buhrdur, several trolls etc. This was not always met with approval e.g. many people say that the plastic Fellowship is inferior to their metal counterparts or I heard a lot, how people fancy over the very first metal Mordor Orcs (which since then have never been sold again). Maybe partly because of that, these old miniatures see now and then a made-to-order release for a limited time.
If you like the plastic/resin version of an old metal miniature or not, it cannot be denied that the change makes them cheaper, easier to assemble and sometimes easier to handle. 
Many people gonna be happy for their return.
Photo credit: GW

Nowadays it seems like GW moved mostly away from the "first release as metal" approach and translated to plastic. Which I think is a shame but more on that in the following sections.

Advantages

Metal naturally is very resilient. Especially in comparison to plastic and resin. Pretty much any infantry model falling down from a table or your hand won't receive much damage - yeah maybe a blade is twisted but you can easily bend it back. Same goes for similar things that might appear on new models e.g. lances of knights. Correcting errors like this is easy. Additional the tooth of time won't nearly hurt them as much as the other materials (if correctly stored of course).

Tin miniatures are probably the easiest ones to be stripped of paint and add your own. This makes them very attractive to be bought second-hand and not having to care about the maybe bad coloring. Stripping them from paint is easy and won't hurt the models if done correctly. And it can be done over and over again.

There is something really satisfying in holding a metal miniature in your hand or moving it over the battlefield. It feels like "more" compared to the other materials.
This is also connected with the feeling that metal as material, means more value - more on that in my opinion section.

Disadvantages

Metal miniatures can be hard to assemble. Especially the bigger and more complicated the model is. They are easier prone to irregularities. This is more of a problem when they appear on areas that should be flat (placing them on bases) or were two or more other parts meet. There you normally apply the glue and put them together. But irregularities can result in gaps and peaks which make it hard to impossible to glue them together. Or they leave unplanned gaps. In these cases you must make use of modelling putty or superglue + baking Soda and put additional work into it.

I am not sure if people missed the metal Balrog^^
Photo credit: GW

Where on simple or infantry models, the weight of the metal feels good, it can be a pain on fancy and/or big ones. Placing metal infantry on the slope of a hill or on a step proves already inconvenient because they tend to fall over. But trying the same with a Gulhavar, Buhrdur or Balrog is not only impossible but also poses the danger that the falling miniature damages the board or other miniatures.
Really big or heavy models which fall down a table additionally not only damage themselves (their weight works against them) but potentially also the floor.
Weight also affects you negatively when you have a lot of metal models and you try to transport them.

The nature of tin - more resilient than plastic/resin and at the same time soft enough to easily forgive accidents - at the same time makes it harder to modify miniatures.

And while applied force may not break a miniature easily, it does have another unwanted effect: The applied paint can chip off. There are ways to better prevent this but nonetheless it is a possible problem.

And last but not least - having metal as material clearly shows on the price tag. Which is not so much a problem on heroes and elite miniatures - after all you will need only one or a handful.
It does however become a problem when you are faced with the fact that you want to collect an all metal army. Having metal warriors might appear like a cool thing if the design is good or if they are not your only choice. But otherwise you have to prepare to spend a lot of money.

My Opinion

To get it out of the way: I love my metal! If I have the choice between the same miniature being available as metal or resin, I don't need even  a second to give my answer. If it is between plastic or metal, it depends on the design. But in general I love having my heroes or elite miniatures in metal. 

I do not know if it has something to do with my (or older) generation(s) but having something made of metal feels like having more value. I mean, money wise it definitely is xD But beside that it feels special and fitting that heroes and elites are also made of special material. Maybe it has to do with the fact that we are nowadays surrounded by so much plastic, fake wood, glass and "unnatural" material in our everyday life, that we appreciate something "real".

Most of the time you can spot on first sight if a model is made of metal or something else. The limitation in details at the same time gives it a special look and feel that cannot be captured with other materials.
I am so happy this model has nothing to do with the Hobbit movies... I love the design, the weight and the look it has due to being made of metal =)
Photo credit: GW

Also being seemingly a bit clumsy with my miniatures (having dropped multiples ones already several times), I appreciate the resilience a lot.

I do however also feel the pain of what it means to collect a full metal army. My latest next army project will be Khand - one of the most expensive armies to collect due to having only metal miniatures and small blisters (the biggest box contains 10 infantry models for 35 € - for a cheaper price you get 20 Uruk-Hai warriors...). Other armies suffering from the same fate are the Shire (mostly metal), the Rangers (full metal but at least with plastic alternatives), Far Harad (mostly metal) and the infamous Arnor (full metal but also OOP since a long time...).
Needing so many but only coming in blisters of two...
Photo credit: GW

Plastic

Past

There were iniatures accompanying the DeAgostini collectors magazine. Their plastic is brighter and softer/more flexible than the later versions. As far as I was able to find out, this plastic was really only used for the DeAgostini miniatures.

Present

Plastic in the MESBG range of GW is darker and harder than its predecessor. I do not know if the chemical composition changed over time but seemingly not much changed since the early days of the system.
Just recently with the realese of the "Balins Tomb" boardgame, we also received colored plastic. As far as I have heard, this has no influence on its handling and properties.

Advantages

Plastic is cheaper than metal and resin - in regard of the required resources as well as in production. The later is done via injection moulding process, which requires the mass to be still hot.

The weight is much lesser than metal. This improves the transportability + the handling in both the assembling and on the battlefield. 

Plastic is the best material for modifications. Cutting off heads, arms, weapons etc and replacing them with other GW or even alternative stuff, is easily done.

It is also the best material to paint on. You do not have to prepare it or afterwards seal it with varnish. And while paint stripping is a little bit more delicate (and endlessly possible) than metal, it still offers the possibility.

In regard of resilience, plastic is a good middle ground between metal and resin. The light weight protects the miniatures from the self when hitting the ground. Also due to being softer but not too rigid, it is harder to break off weapons or other exposed parts.

The amount and level of detail on miniatures can be better than metal and you can achieve amazing results, as the new Witch-king model from last year is more than prove of.
Photo credit: GW

Disadvantages

As mentioned above, plastic is less resilient than metal and will break easier.

Some see its light weight as disadvantage.

Plastic and its process in creating miniatures, has its limitations when it comes to possible details. If it is sufficient or not is however more a personal taste.

My Opinion

Plastic is great! It is cheaper and mitigates most problems of metal. 
It is my first choice for warriors and miniatures in general, of which I will need the most in my army.
Also for me the level of detail is good enough. It is true that a lot of plastic miniatures in our system are dated and no longer holding up to modern standards. This however has nothing to do with the material but more with the fact that GW never updated them.

Resin

Past

Once upon a time, we had tin and plastic miniatures. And all was well and good. But GW decide it was not enough. Producing tin became more expensive and the solution was the infamous Finecast material. But you probably also heard the term Failcast. 
Propagated as the next hot shit, it was supposed to be better in all regards, while at the same time being cheaper than metal. There is however a reason why it received its nickname Failcast. But it mostly refers to the first generation of miniatures made of this material.

Present

You may wonder why the section header reads "Resin" but so far I only talked about Finecast. The reason is that it is the same thing. We must differentiate between several things.
  • Finecast Resin from GW: Nowadays Finecast is in its second generation. The formula got adjusted and the casting improved. But still very bad^^"
  • Resin from Forgeworld: Most (or all?) miniatures made by FW are listed with resin as material. Which is again a little bit different/better than Finecast.
  • Resin from alternative producers: Most miniatures you can buy from alternative producers, are 3d printed and means another kind of resin.
Resin is cheaper than metal but more expensive than plastic. This has mostly to do with the way how miniatures are produced. Resin uses underpressure to press the material into the forms and so reaches even the tiniest parts. This however means that the forms require frequent replacements.
FW resin production works a little bit different but is improved (nonetheless more expensive...).

Resin is used only in Hobbit stuff or for things that never appeared in the movies.

Advantages

  • Finecast from GW - 1st Generation
    • -
  • Finecast from GW - 2nd Generation
    • Better quality
    • Less prone to damage
    • Light weight
  • FW resin
    • High level of detail
    • Easier to deburr
    • Paint sticks
    • More stable than Finecast
  • 3d printing resin
    • Good level of detail
    • Cheap
    • Good handling

Disadvantages

  • Finecast from GW - 1st Generation
    • Expensive
    • Prone to easily break
    • Hard to deburr
    • Needs to be cleaned and prepared
    • Light weight
    • Hard to glue together
    • Striping not possible or very hard and will result in damage of the miniature if not done very quick and with a lot of caution
    • Hard to modify
  • Finecast from GW - 2nd Generation
    • A bit better in all fields but not much
  • FW resin
    • Super expensive
    • Needs to be cleaned and prepared
    • Breaks easily
    • Light weight
    • Hard to glue together (but better than Finecast)
    • Striping not possible or very hard and will result in damage of the miniature if not done very quick and with a lot of caution
  • 3d printing resin
    • Prone to easily break
    • Light weight

My Opinion

I am not gonna hide the fact that I hate resin. It is of delicate nature when it comes to accidents. The additional preparation it requires. All the other disadvantages. And on top of it all, I am also required to pay a higher price for all this...

No sorry but the higher level of detail is simply not worth having deal with all this irksomeness...
I really love this models but I wonder if they could not have achieved a similar good result with plastic. I am thankful I could buy them second-hand.
Photo credit: GW

I can live with resin as it is used by alternative producers. It is still delicate but surprisingly they sell their miniatures for a fraction of the GW/FW prices. I know there are more factors than resource costs but still the difference is quite significant.

Conclusion

Wow this post turned out much longer than I originally planned to xD But it was entertaining to allow my little inner hobby historian full bent. 
I hope it is as interesting to read as it was to research =) Thanks again to everyone who shared information and opinions with me.

Feel free to let me know in the comments what your preferences and opinions are on the materials in MESBG.

As a last bonus I want to share with you a great video from one of my hobby colleagues from the Würfelorden - he presents and compares the different miniatures of the Witch-king. It fits perfectly into this post because the shown miniatures range through all the materials I presented here and it is very interesting to see the differences in appearance, details and quality. It is only in German though but you can still enjoy the images ;)


The Castellan keeps his watch and happy hobbying until the next time =)

Comments

  1. It's not just the different material that makes new versions in plastic of LotR figures inferior. It is the fact that the initial film based metal figures were sculpted by the Perry brothers, two of the greatest wargaming figure sculptors there are, and the new figures...are not.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well not all new miniatures are inferior but i agree that the Perry brothers did marvelous work :)

      Delete
  2. Having recently put together both Shelob (and re-put her together - darn those spindly legs and large metal body) and a Mordor Troll Cheiftain (whose jagged armor edges wore my thumbs raw), I can say that while I like metal models, I don't LOVE them when they're big. Great review of materials, mate!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thx a lot! :)
      I totally agree with you. After a certain size or number of extravagante parts, metal miniatures become cumbersome and problematic.

      Delete
  3. I found metal models an enormous pain to superglue. It didn't bond nearly as fast as with plastic, so I'd either be holding the parts pressed together for over a minute, trying not to jiggle them, or prop them up with bits of cardboard and cloth to let gravity do the work. Either way, it was a pain and sometimes had to be done over again.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hmm I admit that so far I only worked with infantry sized tin miniatures and had no problem there.
      I had similar problems though with Resin.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MESBG VS 40k 10. Edition - Meine ersten Erfahrungen

Rise of the Necromancer LL Review

MESBG VS 40k 10th Edition - First Experience